Two buyers inspect the same period house in Camberwell. One sees a home. The other sees a home, a permit application and a second dwelling at the rear. Whether the second buyer is right is decided almost entirely by three documents: the title, the planning scheme and the vendor’s statement. Here is how to read them before you commit.
Restrictive covenants
A restrictive covenant is a private agreement recorded on title that limits what can be done with the land, usually imposed when an estate was first subdivided, sometimes a century ago. The most common in Melbourne’s established suburbs is the single dwelling covenant, which prohibits more than one house on the lot and therefore kills subdivision outright. Others limit building materials, height, setbacks, fencing or even the number of rooms. Covenants are enforceable by the owners of the other lots that had the benefit of the original subdivision (often the whole street), and a council must refuse a planning permit that would breach one.
They can be removed or varied, either through the planning scheme amendment process or by application to the Supreme Court, but the test is demanding and objections from a single benefited owner can defeat it. Treat a covenant as permanent unless you have specific advice that it is not, and never pay a subdivision premium for land encumbered by one on the assumption it can be dealt with later.
Section 173 agreements
A different animal: an agreement between the owner and the council registered on title under section 173 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987. These are commonly imposed as a condition of an earlier permit and can require or prohibit almost anything: no further subdivision, a landscaping regime, restrictions on use, contributions payable on development. They bind every future owner. They appear in the Section 32 and on the title search, and they are frequently overlooked because they are less familiar than covenants.
Heritage overlays and neighbourhood character
A heritage overlay applies to a great deal of Melbourne’s inner and eastern housing stock. Under an overlay you generally need a planning permit to demolish, alter or extend, and permits to demolish a contributory building are hard to obtain. An overlay does not necessarily prevent development (sensitive rear extensions are often approved), but it removes the knock-down-rebuild option and lengthens every timeline. Beyond formal overlays, neighbourhood character provisions and design and development overlays control height, siting and appearance, and these are where many multi-unit proposals are cut back at council or at VCAT.
Zoning and what it actually permits
The zone sets the baseline. A Neighbourhood Residential Zone applies mandatory height and, in some schedules, garden area requirements and a cap on dwellings per lot. A General Residential Zone is more permissive; a Residential Growth Zone or a Mixed Use Zone more again. Minimum garden area requirements under the residential zones have quietly ended a lot of subdivision plans on standard blocks. Check the zone, the schedule to the zone, and every overlay affecting the land, not just the ones in the vendor’s statement, which discloses but does not interpret.
Overlays that cost money rather than options
- Special Building Overlay and Land Subject to Inundation: flood-prone land, with implications for floor levels, insurance and future development.
- Bushfire Management Overlay: significant construction requirements, relevant on the urban fringe and the Peninsula.
- Environmental Significance and Vegetation Protection Overlays: permits needed to remove trees, which can determine where a building envelope can sit.
- Development Contributions Plan Overlay: levies payable on development.
Practical due diligence before you bid
- Order and read the title, including the plan and any instruments referred to on it. Covenants are recorded as instruments, and the wording matters.
- Get a planning certificate and check the zone and every overlay.
- Ask the council’s planning department directly what would be required for what you intend, and whether anything similar has been approved nearby. It is free and it takes one phone call.
- If the plan depends on a permit, make the contract conditional on obtaining one, with a realistic timeframe, or accept that you are taking the risk.
- If there is an existing permit, check whether it has been acted on and when it expires. Permits lapse.
- For anything substantial, get a town planner’s written opinion before the auction, not after.
And if the property has unpermitted works
Non-compliant structures (a garage over a boundary, a pool without a compliant barrier, a converted garage without a building permit, an extension that was never certified) become your problem at settlement. The vendor’s statement must disclose building permits from the last seven years, which is a narrow window; older work may be entirely undocumented. Council enforcement, an insurer’s refusal to cover, or a purchaser’s solicitor raising it when you later sell are all live consequences. Price it, require rectification before settlement, or walk.
We advise buyers on title restrictions, overlays and development potential across Melbourne, with pricing disclosed before you engage us. Book a free first consultation, or read our guide to prestige property due diligence.
Frequently asked questions
Can a single dwelling covenant be removed?
Sometimes, but it is difficult. The routes are a planning scheme amendment or an application to the Supreme Court, and both require satisfying a demanding test about detriment to the owners who benefit from the covenant. A single sustained objection can be enough to defeat it. Never assume removal is achievable when pricing land for development.
Does a heritage overlay stop me from renovating?
Not necessarily. Overlays require a planning permit for demolition, alteration and new building work, and councils commonly approve sensitive rear and internal work while protecting the street-facing fabric. What an overlay generally does prevent is demolition of a contributory building and replacement with something entirely new.
What is the difference between a covenant and a section 173 agreement?
A covenant is a private restriction created on subdivision and enforceable by the owners of benefited land. A section 173 agreement is an agreement with the council, usually imposed as a permit condition, and enforceable by the council. Both are registered on title and both bind future owners, but they are removed by quite different processes.